Skip to main content
Demo mode, registration is bypassed for review. Not production behavior.

AFO · Head-to-head

NRC IRAP vs Strategic Innovation Fund (SIF)

Both fund Canadian industrial innovation but at very different scales and on very different terms. IRAP is mid-sized ($50K–$10M) advisory-plus-funding for R&D projects, with the NRC industrial technology advisor as a key part of the value. SIF starts at $10M total project cost and runs five distinct strategic streams — R&D, expansion, investment attraction, ecosystem, and collaboration — with a heavier application process and larger contribution sizes.

Side by side

How the two programs compare.

The matrix below pulls directly from the catalog. Each row shows the same data point across both programs so you can spot the differences at a glance.

Comparison matrix of NRC IRAP — Industrial Research Assistance Program and Strategic Innovation Fund (SIF)
AttributeNRC IRAP — Industrial Research Assistance ProgramStrategic Innovation Fund (SIF)
Capital typeGovernment grantGovernment grant
FamilyGrants & refundable tax creditsGrants & refundable tax credits
Size range$50,000 $10,000,000$10,000,000 No ceiling
Typical costNon-repayable contribution covering up to ~80% of internal technical salaries and ~50% of contractor costs on eligible projects.Mix of non-repayable contributions and conditionally repayable amounts depending on stream and project. Typically funds 25–50% of eligible costs.
Speed to closeWeeks to a few monthsMonths
EligibilityFor-profit incorporated Canadian SME with under 500 staff and a project with clear technical innovation plus a credible commercialization plan. Pairs financial assistance with NRC technical advisors.Canadian incorporated firm with a multi-year industrial project (typically $10M+ total project cost). Five program streams cover R&D, firm expansion, investment attraction, ecosystem, and collaboration.
Use of proceedsR&D / innovationR&D / innovation, Expansion
StatusLive — self-serveComing soon

Choosing between them

Which is the right answer?

Each side describes the scenarios where the program is the stronger fit. Most real-world deals end up in the “in common” section below — neither/nor.

When to choose

NRC IRAP — Industrial Research Assistance Program

Pick IRAP when the project is technical R&D in the $50K–$10M band, the company is an SME under 500 staff, and the advisory relationship with the NRC matters as much as the funding. IRAP covers up to ~80% of internal technical salaries on approved projects and the NRC advisor reviews the technical and commercialization roadmap throughout.

When to choose

Strategic Innovation Fund (SIF)

Pick SIF when the project is $10M+ total, strategically significant nationally (industrial R&D, firm expansion of national consequence, investment attraction), and the company can absorb a longer application cycle (typically 6–12 months from initial conversation to funded). SIF funding is structured as contributions (a mix of non-repayable and repayable depending on stream) covering 25–50% of eligible costs.

What they have in common.

Both stack with refundable tax credits (SR&ED, Clean Tech ITC) on the same project. A large industrial program frequently runs SIF on the capital-structure side, IRAP on the early technical work, and SR&ED on the eligible R&D pool — three programs underneath the same project plan, sequenced carefully.

Still not sure which one fits?

The CPA can look at your specific situation and tell you in one twenty-minute call which program (or stack) is the right structure — and what providers will want to see before the first conversation.