Skip to main content
Demo mode, registration is bypassed for review. Not production behavior.

Use case

CSBFP for renovations and build-out.

The Canada Small Business Financing Program finances leasehold improvements — the tenant work that transforms a bare commercial space into an operating business location. Eligible scope includes demising walls and partitions, flooring, ceilings, electrical and plumbing rough-in, HVAC modifications, washrooms, kitchen rough-in, millwork and built-in casework, finishes, painting, signage installation, and the contractor's general conditions and project management. Leaseholds share the $500,000 non-real-property sub-limit with equipment, intangibles, and term-loan working capital, and the loan amortization has to fit within the lease term plus any committed renewal options.

The leasehold-improvement file: messier than equipment

Where an equipment file underwrites on a single vendor invoice and a known asset, a build-out file underwrites on a contractor scope that is almost always still evolving when the application goes in. Quotes get revised. Permits surface mid-project requirements. Landlord conditions to lease get negotiated in parallel. The deposit hits the contractor before the loan funds. Progress payments overlap with rent commencement. None of this disqualifies the file — leasehold improvements are squarely inside what the program funds — but it means the file needs more deliberate sequencing than an equipment-only application.

For the operator, the question is rarely “can I finance the build-out” (yes) and almost always “how do I sequence the deposits, the progress payments, the lease commencement, and the loan funding so that I’m not bridging too much cash in the gap.” That sequencing is the real content of this page.

What counts as an eligible leasehold improvement

The program’s definition of leasehold improvements is broad but specific: tenant work that improves the leased premises for the tenant’s business use, performed by the tenant (or the tenant’s contractor), and that becomes part of the premises on completion. Typical eligible categories:

  • Demising walls, partitions, and interior build-out — framing, drywall, insulation, door and frame installation, glazing where part of the tenant scope.
  • Flooring— sub-floor preparation, floor coverings (tile, vinyl, hardwood, polished concrete, carpet), transitions and accessories. Replacement of an existing landlord-provided floor with a tenant upgrade is eligible; the new floor just has to be the tenant’s.
  • Ceilings — drop ceilings, drywall ceilings, exposed-ceiling treatments, acoustic treatments.
  • Electrical rough-in and finish — tenant panel, branch circuits, lighting, outlets, data and low-voltage cabling, code-required emergency and exit systems.
  • Plumbing rough-in and fixtures — water supply and waste lines for tenant-installed fixtures, washroom fixtures, kitchen rough-in, specialty trades equipment connections.
  • HVAC modifications— distribution ductwork inside the tenant premises, supplemental cooling for IT closets or kitchens, exhaust hoods, makeup air units. Base-building HVAC upgrades that should be landlord work generally aren’t.
  • Washrooms and accessible facilities — tenant-installed washrooms, accessibility upgrades required by code, fixture installation.
  • Kitchen, bar, and food-service build-out — kitchen rough-in, hood and exhaust, grease interceptor connections, refrigeration distribution (the kitchen equipment itself goes on the equipment line — see CSBFP for buying equipment).
  • Millwork and built-in casework — reception desks, fitting rooms, built-in shelving, built-in display, service counters. Removable furniture goes on the equipment line; built-in is leasehold.
  • Finishes, paint, and decor — priming, painting, wallcoverings, decorative finishes that become part of the premises.
  • Signage installation — the cost of installing exterior or interior signage as part of the tenant build-out. The sign hardware itself can sit on the equipment line.
  • Contractor’s general conditions and project management— supervision, site services, temporary protection, cleanup, project management overhead, builder’s risk insurance. The lender expects the GC’s overhead and profit to be a defined percentage on the contract, not a vague allowance.
  • Design fees — architect, designer, engineer, and consultant fees directly attributable to the tenant build-out. Lenders sometimes treat these as intangibles rather than leasehold improvements; clean files include them in the tenant work scope with the contract documents.
  • Permits and inspections — building permits, occupancy permits, trade inspections, code-required testing and commissioning.

What is not the tenant’s leasehold work

Several categories sit outside the eligible scope — either because they are the landlord’s responsibility, because they are the building owner’s capital improvement, or because they are operating expenses rather than capital work:

  • Landlord-paid work.Many commercial leases include a landlord work letter or a tenant- improvement allowance. Work the landlord is paying for — directly performing or reimbursing through a TI allowance — cannot be CSBFP-financed by the tenant. The financed scope is the tenant’s net cash spend, not the gross project cost.
  • Base-building structural work. Structural alterations to the building (load- bearing walls, structural reinforcement, roof work, exterior envelope) are normally the building owner’s capital responsibility. Where a tenant takes on structural work, the lender will scrutinize whether the work belongs in the tenant line at all.
  • Base-building system upgrades. Bringing a building’s electrical service, plumbing main, or HVAC plant up to a tenant’s needs is often landlord work — even if the tenant is contributing. The split between “tenant connection from a sized supply” (financeable) and “upsizing the base-building supply itself” (landlord) matters.
  • Furniture, fixtures, and equipment. Movable items — desks, chairs, tables, removable shelving, kitchen equipment, POS hardware — go on the equipment line, not the leasehold line. They share the $500,000 sub-limit either way, but the classification affects amortization (equipment amortizes to useful life; leaseholds amortize to lease term).
  • Soft costs unrelated to the tenant work. Pre-opening marketing, legal fees for the lease negotiation, business registration, accounting setup — these are operating costs and sit outside the CSBFP envelope (some pieces may fit on the term-loan working-capital sub-limit, capped at $150,000).
  • Restoration at lease end. The cost of restoring the premises at lease end is not a capital improvement for CSBFP purposes; it is a future operating cost.

How the $500,000 sub-limit accommodates build-out

Leasehold improvements sit inside the $500,000 non-real- property sub-limit, sharing that envelope with equipment, intangibles (capped at $150,000), and term-loan working capital (capped at $150,000). For a build-out-heavy file, the leasehold-improvement piece can occupy most or all of the $500,000 — there is no separate leasehold sub-limit underneath the non-real-property line.

The interaction with equipment matters. A restaurant file typically pairs $250,000 of leasehold improvements with $200,000 of kitchen and front-of-house equipment; a clinic build-out pairs $200,000 of leaseholds with $250,000 of medical equipment; a retail build-out often runs heavier on leaseholds ($300,000) than on equipment ($60,000 of fixtures and POS). The sub-limit holds the two together at $500,000 combined, so the project scoping decision — what gets done in built-in millwork versus removable fixtures, what counts as leasehold versus equipment — has real financial consequences for the file.

Amortization and the lease term

The program requires that the amortization of a leasehold-improvement loan not exceed the lease term, including committed renewal options that are enforceable in the lease document. The intent is to keep the financed improvement on the premises for at least as long as the loan is being repaid — the tenant shouldn’t be paying off the leasehold loan after the premises have been handed back to the landlord.

In practice:

  • A five-year lease with no renewal option supports up to a five-year amortization on the leasehold improvement loan. Tight, often punishing on the monthly payment.
  • A five-year lease with a five-year renewal option that the tenant has the unilateral right to exercise (no landlord re-letting, no rent-reset clause that functions as a veto) supports up to a ten-year amortization.
  • A ten-year lease with two five-year renewal options supports up to a twenty-year amortization, which is effectively the program’s maximum on leasehold improvements and often matches the maximum amortization for the loan as a whole.

The lender will read the lease document. Renewal options that are subject to landlord approval, market- rent resets that the tenant has no protection against, or relocation clauses that let the landlord move the tenant don’t count as committed renewals for amortization purposes. The cleanest leasehold- improvement files come with a tenant-friendly long- term lease in place before the loan goes to underwriting.

The deposit and progress-payment problem

Construction contracts run on a deposit-and-progress- payment schedule that doesn’t line up neatly with CSBFP funding. A typical contractor payment cadence:

  • 10-20% deposit on contract signing
  • Progress payment on substrate or rough-in completion
  • Progress payment on mechanical or finishes start
  • Progress payment on substantial completion
  • Holdback released after the lien-act period

CSBFP funding typically comes in one or two lump disbursements after the loan is approved and the work is substantially underway. The operator usually bridges the deposit and the early progress payments out of personal cash, a short-term facility, a credit line, or vendor terms — then the CSBFP loan funds in time to cover the later progress payments and to refinance the already-spent deposit work, provided the work falls inside the program’s 365-day refinance window. See CSBFP 365-day rule.

This sequencing affects working-capital planning. The operator needs enough liquidity to fund the deposit and the early progress payments without straining other parts of the business. Files that under-plan the bridge tend to discover the gap mid-project and scramble to extend a credit line. The cleanest applications budget the bridge explicitly and document it in the use-of-funds narrative.

Change orders, contingency, and scope drift

Construction projects almost always run over scope. Permit-driven changes, unforeseen site conditions, code interpretations that surface during inspection, and tenant-requested upgrades all generate change orders. The CSBFP-approved loan amount is set at the time of approval based on the contract value as submitted; if the project runs over, the overrun does not automatically increase the approved loan.

Two ways to handle this in the file:

  • Build a contingency into the financed amount. A 10-15% contingency line in the contract value is normal for build-outs and is accepted by lenders provided it is documented in the contract and not left as a vague allowance. The contingency creates headroom for change orders without re-opening the loan.
  • Plan for an out-of-pocket overrun cushion. Beyond the contingency, the operator needs a personal-cash or working-capital reserve to cover true overruns. Files that leave the operator with no cushion after the loan funds are the files that get into trouble when something surfaces.

For larger build-outs (over $300,000 of leasehold work), some lenders ask for a fixed-price contract with a defined contingency rather than a cost-plus arrangement. Cost-plus contracts are financeable but require more detailed monitoring and tend to attract more scrutiny during disbursement.

Documentation the lender wants on the build-out line

A clean renovation file documents the work the way a lender’s construction-loan group would document it. The standard package:

  • Signed contractor agreement with a defined scope of work, fixed or fixed-plus-contingency pricing, a payment schedule, and lien-act compliance. Cost-plus arrangements are accepted but get more underwriting attention.
  • Itemized scope of work tying the contract value to the eligible-leasehold categories above. Lenders pull out items that belong on the equipment line or that are landlord work.
  • Building permits — applied for or issued — for the work. Pre-permit files can be underwritten but typically have a permit-condition on funding.
  • Executed lease with the term and renewal options that support the requested amortization, plus the landlord work letter if the landlord is doing or paying for any portion of the project.
  • Design package or basic drawings showing the scope being built. For small build- outs, a one-page sketch and a written description is enough; for build-outs over $200,000, the lender expects design drawings.
  • Contractor’s WSIB / WCB clearance, insurance certificates, and builder’s risk coverage showing the project is properly covered before work starts.
  • Proof of deposit and early progress payments for the 365-day refinance pattern — bank statements, cleared cheques, contractor receipts.

How build-out files commonly stall

Build-out files run into a familiar set of issues (see also 7 reasons CSBFP applications get rejected):

Lease term that doesn’t support the amortization.The number one stall on leasehold-improvement files. A five-year lease with no renewal option won’t support a ten-year amortization, which means the requested monthly payment doesn’t fit the business’s projected cash flow, which means the file gets re-sized down or declined. Operators sometimes have to go back to the landlord for a longer term or a firmer renewal option before the file can be underwritten as scoped.

Landlord work and tenant work commingled. When the work letter is vague about who is paying for what, the lender can’t cleanly fund the tenant scope. Files that come in with a clear work-letter split and a tenant-side budget that excludes landlord- paid items underwrite faster.

Contract value drifting between application and approval. Build-out costs almost always tick up between the first quote and the signed contract. Files that submit a soft quote and then sign a contract 15% higher have to come back through re-underwriting. The cleanest path is to lock the contract before the application, with a defined contingency for change-order risk.

Permits flagged but not pulled. Pre-permit files are financeable, but the loan conditions will require permits before disbursement. Where the city is slow on permits, this can extend the timeline by weeks. Files that show permits in progress with a credible timeline underwrite cleaner.

Items mis-classified between leasehold and equipment. Built-in millwork versus removable furniture, hard-wired versus plug-in equipment, hood installation versus the hood itself. The lender will re-classify items during underwriting; files that anticipate the classification by structuring the invoice that way upfront move faster.

How the sub-limits stack on a typical build-out file

A clarifying example. A new dental clinic opening in leased space:

  • Demising walls, ceilings, flooring, finishes: $120,000
  • Electrical, plumbing, HVAC modifications: $95,000
  • Built-in millwork (reception, ops cabinetry): $55,000
  • Permits, design, project management: $35,000
  • Contingency (10%): $30,000
  • Leasehold-improvement subtotal: $335,000
  • Dental chairs, imaging, sterilization, IT: $150,000

Total non-real-property spend: $485,000 — comfortably inside the $500,000 sub-limit, with $15,000 of headroom for change-order overrun beyond the built-in contingency. The leasehold-improvement portion amortizes to the lease term (typically a ten-year lease with two five-year renewal options for a clinic), allowing the program’s longer amortization. The equipment portion amortizes to the assets’ useful life (seven to ten years). Many lenders write this as a single term loan with a blended amortization; some prefer two parallel term loans.

Build-out paired with real property

When the operator owns the building rather than leasing it, the leasehold-improvement concept doesn’t apply — improvements to owner-occupied real property sit on the real-property line under the $1,000,000 ceiling, with the 50% business-use rule. See CSBFP for buying a building for the real-property mechanics. The build-out work is still financeable; it just lives on a different line of the file with a different sub-limit and a different amortization profile.

The realistic timeline

Build-out CSBFP files typically run five to seven weeks from completed application to funded loan — slower than equipment-only files because the lease, the contract, the permits, and the design package all have to come together before underwriting can close. Files that submit with the lease executed, the contract signed, and the permits applied for tend to fund in the lower end of that range. Files that submit pre-lease or pre- contract can take longer. See how long CSBFP approval takes for the stage-by-stage breakdown.

Where to go next.

  • Use case

    CSBFP for buying equipment

    The other half of the $500,000 sub-limit — how equipment and leasehold improvements share the envelope, and where the classification of an item actually matters.

  • Concept

    The CSBFP 365-day rule

    How deposits and early progress payments made out-of-pocket can be refinanced into the loan when the work falls inside the program’s rolling 365-day window.

  • Beyond the cap

    Alternative funding options

    For build-outs above the $500,000 non-real-property sub-limit, complex multi-phase renovations, or projects that need a construction-loan structure rather than a CSBFP term loan.

Ready to fund the build-out?

Start with the thirty minutes of free education. The videos cover what lenders look for on a leasehold- improvement file — including the lease-term-to- amortization fit, the landlord-versus-tenant scope split, and the deposit-and-progress-payment bridge that makes or breaks the cash plan.